I'll use harmonics for both bearish and bullish case. ASSUMING that the top is in, ABCD bearish scenario is in play. Congratulations to those who have shorted :) For the bullish case scenario, I'm seeing a Cypher pattern, which directs us to the 40k region and I think this will be the accumulation of whales in preparation for the next cycle. In connection to my previous post using my crude representation of the waves, 40k area is the legendary trading zone and it might be tested as a support that will take us to 200k+ next cycle. Just my two cents. Good luck trading.
#BTCUSDT Bitcoin is currently displaying bearish momentum following a parabolic rounding top pattern, leading to a decisive break below the $81,000 support zone. ? Technical Analysis: ? Breakdown from Support: BTC failed to hold its key support and is now facing a lower high rejection, confirming further downside. ? Potential Retest: Expecting a retest of the $81,000 area before continuing lower. ? Targeting $78K - $77.5K: This area is a critical demand zone where we could see buying interest and potential reversal signs. ? Trading Plan: Short Scenario: ? Entry: Retest near $81,000 - $81,200 ? Stop Loss: Above $82,000 ? Take Profit: $78,000 - $77,500 Long Scenario (If BTC Rebounds): ? Look for bullish signs near $78K ? Possible bounce back towards $80K+ ? Market Sentiment: ? Bullish if: BTC holds $78K and reclaims $81K. ? Bearish if: BTC loses $77.5K, opening the door to $75K next. What’s your outlook? Comment below! ??
Nifty Midcap chart shows still more pain in coming days and rebound from the level shown
3/13/25 :: VROCKSTAR :: NASDAQ:TTAN Not worth $50. - a total avoid - this thing pops and i'll be there to fade - but 10x sales for hardly 20% growth - mediocre mgns - hardly 1% fcf flow - and worst of all, stinky PEs trying to dump their bags on public bag holders. let those trolls hold their own dog poop. - probably a nice mgmt, good company etc. but i'm purely interested in the stock - and no way. jose! V
Real GDP and the S&P 500 are interconnected indicators of economic health, though they measure different aspects of the economy. Real GDP reflects the total value of goods and services produced, adjusted for inflation, and serves as a broad measure of economic growth. The S&P 500, on the other hand, represents the performance of 500 large-cap U.S. companies and is often seen as a barometer of corporate profitability and investor sentiment. Generally, when Real GDP grows, it signals a healthy economy, which can boost corporate earnings and drive stock prices higher, positively impacting the S&P 500. Conversely, a decline in Real GDP, such as during a recession, can weigh on corporate profits and lead to declines in the S&P 500. However, the relationship isn't always direct or immediate. For example, the S&P 500 is forward-looking and often reacts to expectations of future GDP growth rather than current data. Additionally, factors like monetary policy, interest rates, and global market conditions can influence the S&P 500 independently of Real GDP trends. In periods of economic uncertainty, the S&P 500 might rally on hopes of stimulus or recovery, even if Real GDP data remains weak. Thus, while Real GDP and the S&P 500 often move in tandem over the long term, their relationship can diverge in the short term due to market sentiment and external influences.
Gold is forming higher highs while forming an ascending triangle, which will be confirmed if the price of gold closes above the record high of $2,982/oz on a daily basis. If the price of gold breaks the record high, then the price of gold will target the round mark of $2,990/oz. If the buyers conquer the latter, a test of the psychological barrier of $3,000/oz will be inevitable. The 14-day relative strength index (RSI) is moving higher above 50, supporting the case for further upside in gold prices. On the other hand, the price of gold has strong support at the 21-day simple moving average (SMA) of $2,914/oz. If the selling pressure intensifies, the price of gold will challenge the ascending trendline support of $2,893/oz. Failure to defend this level will accelerate the decline towards the psychological level of $2,850/oz. Resistance 2980 2990 3000 Support 2950 2930 2900 As always, we will be updating regularly throughout the day and letting you know how we are managing active ideas and settings. Thank you all for your likes, comments, and attention, we really appreciate it!
I am only long if weekly candle closes above the red resistance line other wise price has to fall to 55$
Support: The lower purple zone indicates a strong support level where the price has bounced. Resistance: The upper purple zone marks a resistance area where price has been rejected multiple times. 2. Moving Averages: 200 EMA (Blue): At 82,800.42, acting as dynamic resistance. 30 EMA (Red): At 82,090.72, indicating short-term trend direction. 3. Trade Setup: A long position is planned from the current support level. Entry: Around 80,026.98 (near support). Stop Loss: Around 76,980.09 (below support). Take Profit Targets: TP1: 81,636.34 TP2: 82,800.42 (near 200 EMA) TP3: 84,481.83 TP4: 86,260.26 Final Target: 88,297.36 4. Conclusion: The setup expects a bounce from support with a target back towards resistance levels. Breaking 82,800 (200 EMA) is crucial for further bullish momentum. If the price falls below 80,000, the setup might get invalidated. Would you like a deeper breakdown on any part? ?
We're here to make money! I don't care about politics or idealists. If TSLA makes +20% in the next few weeks, I'll be very happy! End of story. I only do technical analysis. No emotions here. hedge funds, YOUR pension funds and market makers have to pay themselves! They're buying the dip, while you're watching the stock collapse! Wake the hell up! Some troll here haha
The inflation rate and the Federal Funds Rate are deeply interconnected, with the Federal Reserve using the latter as a primary tool to manage the former. When inflation rises above the Fed's target (typically around 2%), the Fed often increases the Federal Funds Rate to tighten monetary policy. Higher rates make borrowing more expensive, which can reduce consumer spending and business investment, thereby slowing economic activity and helping to curb inflationary pressures. Conversely, when inflation is too low or the economy is sluggish, the Fed may lower the Federal Funds Rate to stimulate borrowing, spending, and investment, which can help boost economic activity and push inflation toward the target. However, this relationship is influenced by external factors such as supply chain disruptions, energy prices, and global economic conditions, which can complicate the Fed's ability to control inflation solely through rate adjustments. For example, during periods of supply-driven inflation (like during a oil price shock), raising rates may have limited immediate impact on inflation but could still be used to anchor inflation expectations. Thus, the Fed's management of the Federal Funds Rate in response to inflation reflects a balancing act between stabilizing prices and supporting sustainable economic growth.